a 'work' site; infection with _the_ teaching urge; could be, by graceful texts of P.D. Ouspensky; it happens when people _are_ but also when they are _not_ e.g. bloggers, writers, teachers etc., i.e. & so on down the scale. Symptoms stronger if such had the privilege of enjoying erudition of Gurdjieff, or had their understanding nourished by Nicoll's Commentaries' unmistakable feel. Maybe during childhood. Maybe some are to experience the symptom, _yet_... time is relative.

Monday, October 02, 2006

No, this is not indexed... nor titled... leave me now, the show is about to begin Oh, I'm on the air already! Sorry, folks.

Hello, I am Mr. OpenBeaver, I will do some imitation of W.H. on his own blog, with his kind permission. You won't even notice the difference, ha, ha, ha... Well, I was thinkin, the other day, about Burton's translationn of Chuang Tzu. Free and easy wandering, it says. When it strikes me, hell, I was always free and easily wandering. People were often surprised, like, how this one so free and easily wandering?? (People, I say, not cowbottom. Cowbottom gets pissed off. Something disturbs him in this free and easy wandering. Gets hiddenly pissed off. Starts to mirror this free and easy wandering. HA HA. Very funny, but nobody's laughing. I don't know if you ever observed such.)

Now, if you want to remain burdened and weary, that's fine with me. It wasn't always so, though. I thought people don't want to be burdened and weary. But just as with cowbottom who, imprisoned, cannot stand someone free, so also with people. Rather than try to break from prison, they want you down there with them.

Which brings to me, I think, dim memory from the time when I was still in the God's garden. God say, your task free and easy wandering. I, no, hell, I know better, surely there some thing I must and can do for my brother, and, so help me God, sister. And go to prison against God's express will. Wow wow wow, full that I was. Funny, eh_? Nobody's laughing, though.

Then find that church. They talk about Jesus, hell, I think, surely they have to do something with this Jesus. When it hits me, would that I could express how it hits me, this not true at all. They want you, tortured, crippled, burned, nailed - leave out crucifixion that is forbidden by the constitution these days. And the myth comes in handy for this intent. Jesus like son of God, you some worm. Funny, ah_? I don't feel like laughing, though.

Now that truth hits me so unexpectedly - hell, it is not at all like I read, satori and seven thousand suns - and it is so soon, I thought I have yet to begin to acquire some knowledge and understanding, I won't have this truth hidden from my brother, and, so God help me, sister. You are Jesus Christ, and that's it. Sounds weird to you? Well, rethink your conditioning first. It's not weird at all. What IS weird is what you (and I, thousand hells) believed. Don't want to believe what I say? Without verifying first? Oh thou brave Work practice efforter, how faithfully thou defendest thy ground. How exactly thou keepest thy commandments. I, W.H., son of living God, PISS on your faithful, exactingful stupidity. Don't give a damn, really. I come here, risking my very neck to tell you this, more I won't do. Read on or throw it to the flames.

It was a mistake-- terr-- ter- terrible---- --- mi- mistake. Which nearly cost me everything. People fear one another, and people fear consequences if they let their conscience guide them. (The good guys, that is. Bad guys... this different story.) Which boils down to: people fear organization. Good conscience guiding not easy. Can only be attained by trial and error. But if fear guide you, practice out of question, also attainment. We'll fire you, will take your wages away. We'll excommunicate you. You will die. And so on. Holy business, why would it need Son of Living God to let himself crucified for this how would you call it terrible stupidity? Besides, what "sin" the heck would you like to see in yourself IN ADDITION to this already horrible terror-o-the-situation? The lie is not in the Gospels, the lie is in the interpretation of the Gospels. You want someone stretch warm hand against you so that you can spit or shit into it, right? Then you are the bad guy. Note: too-easy. (Of course it seems difficult to do because your conscience and essence and everything not yet fucked up in you is against it.) Just below the nether do. And son of God came to stretch his hand to you, right? According to the theologian, yes.

And these tricks with myths and churches work solely because in essence man wants to find God and get out of prison and all that. In this way Mr. Cheat can collect his tax. In the same way state obviates the constitution and says: you want to develop, right? Well, here are our government asses, from those up there who sign papers and approve shit, to the last authorized employee that looks and behaves like shit. Lick every one's butt, smile and say thank you when they kick. Otherwise no development for you, EVER. While the truth, mildly said, quite the contrary.

It is said that, on average, men do not think three minutes in total during their alloted earthly time. I always thought: sure, this sheer exaggeration. Now not think so anymore. Well, I obviously break through this limit, be it by luck, effort, or Grace of God. It remains a mystery, how.

I always hit by how Jesus heal man on Saturday, and this scum contrives to kill him. Because it is meant to hit. Because not a legend, because it a reality. Only, you must not get it: it happened quite a time ago, when there was scum, Jewish, not Christian scum, and when there was still this quite exceptional man that could heal by the mere laying of hands.

Now Jesus out of their reach. (God knows where, forty days this scum wouldn't go away, now it gone long ago where we can paint him with Mary and angels. We theologians smart. The very text that portraits how church is the one who crucifies we will - first - appropriate - second - mutilate - third - interpret. Great - no GNU copyleft on the Bible, what a luck we have.) Jesus is out of their reach, and so are many others. Now it is you who must not see. Now it is you who has to be crucified. Sorry, buddy. (Verify, thou valiant stupid knight. Verify as much as you please. This is an order! Do as you are told!!! Obey!!!!)

Well I sought development and found God. They say they seek God... I don't believe it, though. They get involved with some martyrium and would well draw you down with them. No doubt they develop -- in some direction, anyway.

It my pleasure to talk to you. Now I go. Maybe come back maybe not. Must talk to God (long time no see, understand, because of a mistake, te- terrible- terrible- mi- mistake) mostly regarding His Will regarding my half-baked developmend. I ask, let me out, of course, God say, well, you know better, besides, you have free will, you are son of God, you have God's power, your will was to go to prison... In this way he mock me. Okay, okay, alright, God, I made a mistake. Terrible mistake. I not always know better, what is true is true.

Homework: read Heinlein's Hoag... well, just a suggestion... a nymph - by the river it was, the artificial garden on the Easyjet ship, new model of perpetual motion pistons engine, half way from Mars to Earth - said, hey, read this...

So, to, conlcude, for everything you need God. Cannot write a book without God. You cannot even have free and easy wandering without God. And you cannot have God without Real Conscience functioning in its Real Place.

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

Hello, Earth!

Good to see you. What is this stain? Let's look closer... the writing it says: church. What's this cloud? Let's look closer. It's the underlying idea of the 'church'... "There's no God. There's this almighty church and that's all. We've accumulated enough dried blood on our Karma that yours won't make a difference..."

What's this crowd? Let's look closer. It's the people who believe the church! This is interesting, as well as not too important. We know our sheep and our trees and they know us. Go tell your friends, Earth: the blind see, the lame walk (the leprous are waiting for healing yet, because currently both the church and the state are 'helping' them). Illiterates write. (This is amusing. Not important, either.) Couple of nazis get severely pissed off over diverse 'innocent frivolities'. (Don't forget to tell them this because whatever nazis do - or say - is tremendously important.)

We know them all, of course. To those, however, who close the door on my sheep, without even thinking twice, to those who destroy my trees, we will say: we never knew you.

Wednesday, August 02, 2006

a try...

Ray Of Creation
Do
 
World(s)
 
Of
 
Light
 
Si
La
Sol
Fa
 
World(s)
 
Of
 
Darkness
 
Mi
Re
Do

a feeble rendering of chi-ro

http://www.merseyworld.com/stjohns/windows/symbols.html

It is not feeble at all, being one of the most powerful and most appealing that can be found via Google images. A symbol is, however, less than a shadow of its meaning, meaning of a symbol being (sort of) ever progressing and ever deepening series of meanings, and this is especially true for this one. It signifies no less than fully, harmoniously developed Man, and everything connected with that, everything that can bring it about plus every possible result of such course of development, it implies every reversal on different scales and on different levels that are going to be pushed to achieve it, it points out obstacles that are going to be overcome (not excluding institutional, organized, state- and church-level crime, not forgetting personal dreadful 'stupidity' that rules people who could resume development if it could decrease). It affects and effects all that and more.

Drawing conclusions from the appearance of the linked site itself, chi-ro symbol was preserved within Religion, reminding them members of nothing less than of living God. It is obvious though that its origin and reach far exceeds 'christianity', 'mithraism', or 'esotericism', for example.

For the first time in their lives, made mostly of integral and ordinary 'deliberate' lies, pretty huge number of people will realize that entire line of phenomena, such as blogs like the one you are just reading, are not a joke or something. Some of them will receive special treatment, in one sense or another. Generally (maybe too generally) speaking, it will be (a cause of) Death (reversal), Awakening, or Rebirth, one of them. W.H. gladly links to the symbol as well, after having taken great pains and a lot of waiting only to be really completely sure that it was high time indeed for this to take place.

Friday, July 28, 2006

New thought has no 'label' on the 'envelope'...

Tuesday, July 11, 2006

mapping the invisible onto the color wheel

No yellow, no orange. Very strange greens and blues. Leftmost column is do, rightmost is si. Would it be any better if one saw all twelve?

The world is missing between la and si, and on second thought, between do and re.

If I like it or not, this is how it looks like. There is a slowing of vibration between si and do, between mi and fa, and a third slowing between sol and la. A lot changes between do and re, between re and mi (though a little less than before), between la and si; everything as it should be. Little change between sol and la, which might be the weakness of this model (though I'm not sure it is), but it's just the zone where wavelength changes while the color doesn't.

Friday, July 07, 2006

definition

Wrong. Miracle means that it is considered normal that people know nothing about nature, themselves, not to mention God. It is not normal. It is just statistically prevalent in these times, and it is one of the reason why these times are so hard, generally speaking. Otherwise, miracle is a real event. The very word for it wouldn't had come to exist if it wasn't, in the first place. Above all, it is not violation or alteration of laws. It is just that (normally) it is considered normal that we don't know about much about the laws themselves. It is just that people don't use logic they COULD use, some degree of sane thinking. Law, by definition, is valid everywhere, always, otherwise it wouldn't be law.

More advantageous would be to discuss sane vs. insane meeting of the miracle. Sane approaching is based on verifying by oneself. We are advised to verify by ourself, to distrust, so to speak, the 'miracle' from the start. Insane approach is based on 'believing' or, in the other extreme, on 'rejecting'. A believing person will say, "is ...", "was ...", while the doubter (the denier, essentially) will say, "is claimed to be ...". (Usually, though not always, the very verb "claim" hides the second pathological type behind.) Using this a s a contrast, it's easy to see that the sane approach, while distrusting the perception, also strives to repel suspicious attitude itself, to avoid the trap of denying. Following the definition that miracle is real, observable event, the sane route is exemplified by John (what our eyes have seen, what our hands have touched: we are compelled to state that these are not empty tales).

The Course in Miracles adds another useless definition, "shift in perception" or something. This sounds interesting, must sound interesting, as it points to problem of the observing agent who (I strongly agree here) is by no means some static objective camera, no, not when it comes to miracles! It might not be useless after all. Speaking of cameras and the like: Steiner[17] brings up the view that the whole human being is some sort of "camera" that is registering perceptions of the higher world. It seems plausible to me that such camera can do alot more than piece of electronics. Therefore, to be truly scientific, science must not throw away ordinary reasoning (that, in principle, every grown up man is capable of) at the very outset, but, sorry, that is what happens when it considers proven only what metal pieces of perfected-but-far-from-perfect technology can furnish.

Far, very far away from the cultured world, in some other, exotic land, the naive mind lives, as you know. Well, naive mind can very well sense and very well grasp the meaning of the word miracle, spontaneously, without rational reflection. But it does not know enough, it falls into various traps which are to many to be mentioned here. Nevertheless they are in the two above categories of superstition and materialism.

What is sane talking/writing about the miraculous? We've seen an example of solid encyclopedic entry. That would be correct writing, well, why not. But, from the higher point... The sources seem to hint that one must be able to produce what one writes about. Then the head of the group could rest assured that the writer won't disclose anything inapropriately, prematurely, immaturely or in a way to put people off the track instead of catching interest of those with magnetic centre.