on higher teaching - further tries

my words will remain, even when this earth and everything will be gone; things like this. Of course not actual written or spoken words are meant because they do not last THAT long.

he on whom this stone falls is gonna go to pieces. Characteristic of higher teaching too. When will it happen is not said, but it will happen. Now, it's not a literal stone, this is obvious. Something about incomparable power of higher class of ideas (Holy Spirit, if I may speculate.)

But this is just by the way.

Will not be forgiven. Of course, it might be, and it better be, but when you shit over the son of man all too often and all too much, it is because you hate the ideas themselves. Just speculating. No one belonging to a school can play a role which opposes the school.

Now to ordinay man everything foreign is a threat anyway. That's why it's no use talking to them. These 'teachings' are 'given' to religious leaders, and to state slaves. And lo and behold, when they eat them, their faces are merry, they are taught to pull faces that way every time they go a-murdering. State people are not so merry, at least not sincerely. They know too well that they are doomed if they go on daily in murder-approving, murder-practicing manner, yet they do it because it is their very job, their very wages depend on it. It will require a lot of hands-washing, and they are worried because no hands-washing will actually suffice in such case. Thus, Jesus is milder to Pilate than to anyone else. (In case you were asking if it is possible to know virtually everything about the methods of the state without practising them - the answer is yes.)

Next, we got the mob. This, simply, people. But, people something healthy, while mob always people plus newspapers, politics, 'culture', some indoctrination, some resentment, economic or matter of 'honor' or 'justice', or nationalism.

But let's take a look at religious authorities. Clearly, these are the initiators and executors of the murder(s) themselves, ok, they might urgently need the state sometimes. "He said he was God," that was his sin. And this is certainly outrageous and unheard blasphemy. I see the outlines of the problem along the following. That we are gods is obvious and nothing unusual, it's a most common and truistic truth that one can think of. Certainly nothing surprising. That esotericism exists because people in general do not know it is plain. That people for some curious reason go MAD if they are told this is apparent, at least to me. That they must be educated in this stage by stage, in intelligent way, and as a consequence of their own seeking and in accord with their own demand, is clear. (That some years ago I thought just the other way round does not change the matter. From 'terribly stupid' to 'moderately stupid' is a line of natural progression of things, and a non-reversible one.) Jesus' teaching was practical, and he certainly didn't come to announce the stupidity he was accused of. That's why he doesn't answer with 'I did say' or 'I didn't say it'.

It is possible to convince oneself that Steiner was not a murderer. The methods are outlined in previous posts. Just the same, Hubbard, he was not a murderer. Spalding, no murderer here. Eckhart, not a murderer. Even the worst of 'em all, notorious Greatbeastly Evilest Man Of England, didn't kill many peole, did he. G., N., O., not murderers, except that G. promised to 'kill' brunette titillations. Which leads to inescapable conclusion about organizatorial dynamics, my dear Watson, which also, as you remember, Krishnamurti alluded to in the familiar devil&truth anecdote. Inclination to truthful, careful and detailed research, these are the first fruits of Science, my dear Watson.

I really have been asking myself for YEARS what in the world makes them so angry. And why do they pull their faces so polite and merry when they are. But maybe I really SHOULDN'T try to understand everything, just like a program you are given and now use without going through its internal build, without figuring out every detail. All in all, that's what it boils down to: when you get connected to certain ideas, you begin to be hated. ALL the instances of these haters (I hope you are not saying: oh, I see, now you identify yourself with Jesus... But in case you do, I say once again that I AM INTERESTED in Jesus' ideas because I have noticed that also today's intellectual and theological world thinks it very strange that Jesus had any ideas... ), and I have seen many instances of them, tries to impress you with how smart they are and how powerful they are.

Some people DID, perhaps and probably involuntarily, made a lasting impression upon my astonished and thankful observation, to begin with. I would not call them 'haters', though. Bad for the above category, I must say, bad, as they are sure to fail with their desired result, and that is to force me to recognize them as big and true initiates. Crazy, eh? Who am I to... let's just drop it. Dead alley of thinking, will not lead anywhere. Maybe it is the other way round and they must be 'stupid in higher sense' to even engage in such 'evil' stupidities, neglecting what IS necessary.

Here are the results of my observations, which I do not at least understand. If you begin to study the Bible to intimately get to know Jesus' ideas you will fare as if you were Jesus himself. I admit it is crazy. Who am I to...?! Drop it, drop it. Crazy or not, this is the result of my observations.

Good! For it is getting brighter and I can already see that his fate must have been a joyous one. That he was a simple martyr who taught, among other impracticalities and utopias, to be stupid and engage in cultivating 'moral' and 'humble' character (particularly when faced with 'stronger' and 'more influential' people, eh?), is, after all, rather simple LIE, no matter how wide spread. He made himself God and he died because of the church of those days, but lo, he was God indeed and today's church is recognizing this and has put him on a pedestal. (Thank God he is dead.) For the state, he does not even exist, nor does he matter much, if at all. This is the strangest, the most incongruent story I have ever heard, Watson, what do you think? Nothing fits together. Maybe there's further clue in the book. Be it how it will, what we've got here is somebody who does not play the 'game' by seeing through it. And as a doctor it must have rather will had been gotten dropped to thoust hearded ears how 'games' effectively stop development in early years, shan't thou sayesth?