It is said that this Work is not about being good but about making connection.
This Work is about developing and building. Obviously this invites questions like What? or Building What? and other expressions from beings that have just landed on wrong site. Such beings must be referred to the sources and to other healthy and needed ground-establishing practices. For you must stand somewhere to reach deeper into this Work. Begin by building and practicing at the ground level. Continue formation by consolidating the same ground level concepts and practices. (Those looking for a hint can get it in the references section.[1]) Until you are very good at it. I am inclined to suspect, anyway, that so-called advanced topics are nothing but the same 'basic' topics understood more deeply, i.e. understood at unusual depth.
Now person doing all this will find out something: the built thing crushes to bits, scoffing both at the projest and the 'architect' of the project. On closer inspection, this is because the ground has crushed. Why is all that? Because of the second force of course. In other words, man cannot do. In other words, because personality lives under the law of accident. And so on. One could expatiate on it particulary spaciously if language of octaves were to be used. (And if one had some noteworthy command of this area, which very often is not the case, even with higly enlightened and awakened beings like, for example, W.H.). And all that, thus superficially mentioned, is not an answer, really.
So this Work IS about being good as well, no doubt about that. Only the purpose of the above saying is to tell us something else. That something called 'connection' is not more important than being good, it is rather the very ground on which to build - while 'to be good' (e.g. to be able to do something well) with nothing beyond that is insufficient. Food diagrams and hydrogen tables have more answers on this. But then a complete answer, as usual, would involve all of the system. This system is about being good at making vertico-horizontal connection, not about being no good. Its application is to bring man under another influence, to anoint man, as it were, with a coat of hermetic sealing.
Generally one has to build on 'truth', i.e. using higher hydrogens than those that make for unsuccessful courses of development. Once that is more or less clear, it does make sense to ask What type of questions. Psychological method is not just studying lies and nothing further. In this system, men (men and women, that is, not some indefinite specks of infra-emotion - which will pass on higher knowledge as successfully as a muddy brook after rain reflects sunlight in its 'crystalline', 'spotless' 'depths') study the 'truth', to begin with, and that includes studying (alas, by trying mostly, for the most of us) of the impediments, in the man himself, to begin with. That's why popular, mass fashion self-aggrandizement which commonly says "I" while thinking "you" or "them" quickly loses contact with the system. (Without this type of ill-breeding even noticing the fact.) Yes, it's not primarily about Jim or Jon, it's about valuation and aim and so on. This Work doesn't need all those 'good people' who excel in... not caring much, I guess. (And they don't need the Work, nor do they seek it. After all, what they are good at is severing, sabotaging connection. Alas, broad is the path of destruction. If, for example, the quantity of information that a person has got were important there would be thousands genuine schools overcrowded by overintellignet, overinformed students. While, in reality, even somebody like O. spent half of a lifetime in search.) Please read the following. This Work needs a person that values the idea of becoming good, and values it because, above all, they want to make connection. Reciprocally, such person will need the Work, and they will seek it, for they have seen that better, so far little known methods are necessary. Thank you. The Work, I say, not W.H. You are welcome. (By direct instruction, the path of trying can be significantly shortened, and even replaced by something much more effective, but one must have, alas, at least "ears to hear" for that.)
[1] Crumpleton, Jeremy: Why To Read The Holy Bible Is The Best Advice That Can Be Given
For those who can't get it let it suffice to say that Jeremy basically tells the reader to read the Bible seven times (as a sort of very big, lifetime project). I verified it using my usual rigorous suite of tests, and lo and behold, it is really most brilliant idea. (It must be, for otherwise I wouldn't have a need to reference poor Jeremy's book - you are allowed to say: Jeremy's poor book - on this site. I shouldn't be to cynical, though, for if I think of some distasteful commercials surfacing lately, it's clear immediately that Jeremy's book is wrong target. Also the weapon is wrong. As to the real target, brigades of fully equipped men from Fahrenheit 451 would probably do much good. Even a muslim terrorist would be a gift from heaven for such 'authors'. Hey, this is a brilliant idea. After hundreds of years, once again a brave muslim cavalrist accomplishing the feat would legitimatelly go to muslim heaven. Legitimately at least as far as I, W.H., am concerned.)
Alright, I have failed again to write a decent post [again - Ed.], but every decent writer should fail with such tasks. Because the system is very big, needless to say. Good. Failed to write about the system, it remains to express my opinion, without fail. For IMO, the system appears big because it is connected to - is a 'mask' for - something much bigger. Something that has power to freeze this Earth in a second - or melt it by excessive heat - or, as in the days of Eliah, to influence atmospheric water currents in order to affect their atmospheric upper layers accumulation and axio-radial intercontinental circular exchange and thousand of those things humans ordinarily have no idea about. Something that has power to send some 'authors' gifts after which they will wish they would have been sent muslim terrorists. Something that seemingly tolerates 'injustice' (often in fact quite fascist and murderous and genocidal 'injustice') and 'waits'. Waits like you and me when we don't know what to do. When we don't know what to do but are quite certain that we don't want to make things worse than they already are.
5 comments:
Excellent post. Of great depth. I can learn from it. I'd have to read it again though. That's a sign it's good. Valuable. That notes have to be taken to remember points. You're essencing things. Or attempting to. Maybe not attempting. Unintentional essencing. Maybe not to the core. Maybe to the outer neighborhood where the heat from the Sun is still heat, but a threshold is not crossed where the heat becomes what the heat and light is only a mask of. Hovering around that margin there. Far from Earth though. (It is whatever has the love of the Earth.) Whatever makes the Earth want to grow flowers towards it. Always though we need something to hold on to. Odysseus needed that scarf (or whatever it was) from the ocean goddess as he was drowning off of Nasicaa's island. He wanted something more substantial, you could tell. He also didn't trust the person giving it to him. "Here, let go of that wood that is keeping you afloat, and grab onto his piece of cloth." Right. Yet he did it. We need something to hold on to. The language of Homer, and the Bible (big ultimately), the two conscious shocks (which change the past and make you live in the higher world right now). These are things to hold on to and be held above the waves and guided into new, strange lands...
Wow. I didn't know it was a post of great depth. I should be glad maybe. January 2007: the first comment from outer world lands on the blog. Historical occasion. Somebody with a strong inclination to weary a 'mask', or 'hold', of Caroline. Oh we know Caroline so well. She was on this and that forum. Everybody knows her. Yet, there is something about Caroline I found out about. Nobody really knows Caroline. Nobody. Not even - or especially - Caroline herself. Let alone some Mr. Beasley.
Regarding Homer or Bible, I agree, basically. Although caution should be exercised to not confuse the tools with what the tools are for. IF there is such thing as a way to the truth for other beings, our neighbour. Of which I am become doubtful in the endless cycles of time; to the utmost extent even, to tell the truth.
You're jaded and melodramatic at the same time.
Don't read too much into my religion blog, by the way. Much of it is written within the context of attempting to be 'one of the boys' with the most Village of Morality types in the Christian blogosphere.
It's a legitimate question as to why I would be in such an environment, but I think there was enough in what it offered for learning mainstream, orthodox biblical doctrine, and also for seeing the Work in that doctrine, using biblical language primarily...
Now this makes my 'bomb attack' unnecessary. Yet who can tell it otherwise I wouldn't still be hanging here with Mr. Beasley, not knowing who am I talking to. It's too easy to impersonate somebody in this way, particularly on the web, although not always trivial.
>You're jaded and melodramatic at the same time.
This, I fancy, can be stated in much more practical terms. In any case, don't force me to classify you as one of you-are-overreacting guys: ah well, _others_ are overreacting...
It's Lord's year 2007, February 5th and, for the record, I finished the 2nd reading through the Holy Bible. Now certain diagrams make sense. Much, in fact, makes sense that previously didn't. There's so much that both Paul (trying to put people on the track of faith instead) and even John (stating that there is not enough room in the world for all the books) basically say it is not possible to convey it. For various reasons, most, if not all of them quite valid. Me also, what else. The author of the Revelation says something like, I'm sick of you, timid, defeated cowards. Make way now... and attempts to gather all the interconnected 'threads' of the holy book, multiplying themselves since Genesis, in one omnipotent vision. I remember that Ouspensky's judgement was that the book was written in a state of tremendous emotional upheaval.
Post a Comment